Renderotica

Anything 100% fictional is legal under free speech laws - even stuff that most would find repugnant - Animals, kids, extreme mutilation, etc.  So create with a computer/draw unless it's direct copies of real exact people (a big no-no here) not illegal.

Now here the TOS go against what I mentioned but haven't seen anything noted on incest.  The limit elsewhere is credit processors and whims of whoever owns a site or not.  Japan has tons of incest porn of course and again what I mentioned, usually drawn.  Bringing the stuff to the USA they go "StepMother" - etc. implying from another family so no real incest but...  Funny with Japan since usually have to pixelate openings to the body (Penis head, Vagina, Anus) but all the stuff mentioned.  Well even "Tubgirl" has to obey those rules lest it be "indecent"...

(if you don't know you don't wanna know)

Long and short I can't imagine an 'incest' fantasy being blocked here or getting you in real world legal trouble - IF done by poser/daz figures you just say are cousins, brother and sister, whatever...  Just don't use the face room and put real people's faces on them and then tell people that you did it...  That runs into a LOT of legal trouble and the Admins have good reason to not allow it, even > fictional kids, animals...

Brooks

Seeking legal representation may be sound advise, especially if one lives in the UK and yes certain countries have more lenient laws than others dealing with the age of children in any given sexual publication.   Beasty sex is a No No in almost any country now.  

The smart thing for anyone to do when they align themselves to a website such as ours is to read the sites TOS, and sadly most do not till they get in trouble.  This site forbids Children PERIOD!  clothed or not, if it character looks 17 and under you will get a nasty note from the staff and i think any Mod who might jump in here will say the same. 

Read our TOS and the TOS for any site you align yourself with for any publication.  

The bane of all this is that no mater what you post or where you post, any publication is deemed to be pirated. and what if that publication with your name on it shows up somewhere where the laws are different, Are you subject to prosecution? 

Do your homework check the laws of your country and maybe if you were going to publish something  in hard copy or some e-publications site seek a lawyer or better yet get an agent that will do it for you.   But for a hobbiest??  just check the local laws and make sure you understand in full the websites TOS   as to incest.. any character posted here better look like a freshman in college than a senior in high school.

That's my take on this  

regards  shadoman    PS... I am not staff nor have been connected with staff for some 3-4 years now , so please no private PMs asking for help.  iy tou want answeres click on the help link and then the Contact US tab

SanKapo -

Well -looks like I do need to follow up---

Seems Incest is now no-go on this site...?

Over some other TOS issues I dealt with recently I'd looked over them and not found anything indicating incest - and I assumed the obvious if it violates the "No Minors" issue.  It seems from the moderator's text they updated it recently... "To clarify"...? Perhaps I missed it coz "Incest" isn't anything I'm into?  Don't really care, not moral reasons, just 'Uh, whatever..."  I remember in RL the producer of "Adam and Eve" magazine got sued for refusing ads for such porn in his magazine...  Food play grosses me out, but I just don't buy/watch porn where they smear goop that was once food over each other, I don't think it should be banned and anyone into it is a sickening monster...  Just ain't mah thang.

But I seem to have misinformed so let me correct.

And to the post by Brookes no I'm not a lawyer - I meant the Internet as largely hosted in the world - USA, Japan, Eastern European sites...  I don't know if wherever you live it's illegal for whatever...didn't think that was in the discussion.

The USA - and this has been brought up in court, fictional depictions are fictional.  Kids. Animals. etc.  No-go Renderotica of course but plenty of artists elsewhere create and even sell such content.  And it's been brought up to the supreme court.  USA and Japanese systems.  A few lower level convictions by agenda driven prosecutors but overturned by free speech defenders funded appeal.  There are 'alarmists' aka "Social Justice Warriors" that like to hit the complaint/flag button like a rat in a skinner box needing its next hit of cocaine -  and one of their tactics is to claim things are illegal and they are 'warning' people sometimes pretending to be LEOs.  Nope - if it was illegal they'd go straight to the law, no warnings.  And the law would get a warrant and kick down the door for "Justice by Points" no warning.

Also note a TOS doesn't protect a website from lawyers.

PayPal stands to lose many millions of dollars even if they get a victory because they've been letting said Moralists hit the complaint button too many times... Moralists or pure trolls wanting to ruin someone else's day - while at the same time advertising itself as a place the artist needs not fear a censor.  Same with being sued - either in trying to prevent people from doing something that might be grounds for a lawsuit (aka "Fair use/parody/tribute" which thanks to Mad Magazine is pretty established) or oppressing based on bias (such as left vs right) and relying on TOS to back it up as a free for all shield.  Just it's usually not worth the time/$ to sue - till they really piss someone off.  Also it creates competition if a business limits itself for a non-profit related reason.